LandingBoost research
What actually changed conversion?
Short, source-linked reviews of published landing page experiments. Each report separates the edit, the measured metric, and the limitation—so a reported click lift is never presented as guaranteed revenue.
These are reported results from third-party case studies, not forecasts for your page. Publication bias, audience, offer, traffic quality, and test design can all change the outcome.
+16.53% signups
SaaS Landing Page CTA Tests: What Actually Increased Signups
Three published landing page experiments show when CTA wording, navigation labels, and button choices increased signups or clicks—and where the result stopped short of revenue.
+34% purchases
Social Proof Tests: Where Testimonials and Logos Actually Worked
Published tests of testimonials and customer logos show that proof placement and proximity to the decision can matter more than simply adding a logo row.
>25% lead conversion
Landing Page Form Friction: What Happened When Companies Asked for Less
Evidence from published form and journey experiments shows how progressive fields, shorter processes, and clearer paths affected lead and conversion rates.
How to read these reports
- We preserve the source's reported metric: clicks, signups, leads, or purchases are not interchangeable.
- We flag multi-change tests and missing context instead of assigning the whole result to one UI element.
- Use each result to form a testable hypothesis for your page—not to predict a lift.